Timeforjusticeandprotectionforthechildren: Warning Wisconsin rapids discredited pas theory: links for Wisconsin rapids

see link http://www.thelizlibrary.org/therapeutic-jurisprudence/nelson.txt

"23 With input from Nelson and continuing litigation, a criminal case
transmogrified with therapization into a semi-parental alienation case, with the Mother ultimately put at disadvantage in the civil custody case"
QUOTES FROM CUSTODY EVALUATION:
"Certain forms of contact, the most obvious being some form of penetration would be painful and typically would be experienced as traumatic, but licking and other forms of contact might be perceived by young child as pleasurable or as silly rather than horrible. Where no pain or discomfort is involved, what makes various types of sexual contact traumatic is the meaning to the child and emotional significance of the act. When a child is too young to understand what has occurred trauma is not likely to be experienced."http://www.thelizlibrary.org/therapeutic-jurisprudence/nelson.txt

www.thelizlibrary.org

01 Nelson 02 Michael Jan 03 Ph.D. 04 Psychologist 05 420 1st Avenue South 06 P. O. Box 1535 07 Wisconsin Rapids 08 WI 09 54495 10 715-424-3400 11 715-424-3441 12 Judge James Mason 13 Circuit Court 14 Wood County Branch II 15 unwed 16 01 17 02, Daughter, 6 18 Substantiated child maltreatment (sex abu…

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-2

co-parenting - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

As a LinkedIn member, you'll join 150 million other professionals who are sharing connections, ideas, and opportunities. And it's free! You'll also be able to:

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/states-exposed-to-pas-origins/wisconsin/jun172013-wisconsinrapidswi

Jun 17, 2013 - Wisconsin Rapids, WI. - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

I am 5 months pregnant. My ex boyfriend and I don't get along well, and I prefer not to speak with him until after the baby is born (I have a high-risk pregnancy and his presence is very overbearing/controlling). He's been pressuring me to..

To: "treichert@co.wood.wi.us"Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:21 AM - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Since 1985, the claim of parent alienation syndrome (PAS) has represented the extreme collusion of male entitlement, the mental health profession, and family courts. PAS is a pseudoscientific theory used to prevent battered women from..

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/wisconsin-emails-sent-to/senlassasenlassalegiswisconsinmonfeb182013at904pm

"Sen.Lassa" <sen.lassa@legis.wisconsin. Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:04 PM - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/15-year-old-girl-raped-police-dismiss-case-because-victim-and-attackers-have-low

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/wisconsin-emails-sent-to/danitadanitafamilyctrorgmonaug52013at1127pm

danita <danita@familyctr.org> Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:27 PM - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/wisconsin-emails-sent-to/untitledpost

Untitled Post - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

“As social workers, we need to educate the legal professionals we come into contact with—lawyers and judges and custody evaluators—about the weakness of PAS and similar models explaining what’s going on when children don’t want to have contact with a parent,” says Edleson.

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
79 (P) WISCONSIN RAPIDS Wisconsin Rapids, WI
11/5/2011 2009-2013https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi

Wisconsin Rapids, WI - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

As early as September of 1989 Dr. Gary Melton and Susan Limber in an article entitled "Psychologists' Involvement in Cases of Child Maltreatment" [American Psychologist Vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 1225-1233] commented on the inappropriate use by therapists of syndromes that are not found in the various vers…

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/wisconsin-emails-sent-to/craiglambertdawigovsundec232012at513pm

Craig.Lambert@da.wi.gov Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

The people who support and defend those accused of child sexual abuse indiscriminately, those who join organizations dedicated to defending people who are accused of child sexual abuse with no screening whatsoever to keep out those who are guilty as charged, are...not...

Excerpts Where were the district attorneys who were supposed to block this report? see line 23 |...

timetoprotectchildvictims.blogspot.com

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/let-this-be-a-warning/incestagendapart2

Incest agenda part 2 - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
79 (P) WISCONSIN RAPIDS Wisconsin Rapids, WI
11/5/2011 2009-2013https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi

Wisconsin Rapids, WI - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/wisconsin-emails-sent-to/craiglambertdawigovsundec232012at513pm

Craig.Lambert@da.wi.gov Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
http://timetoprotectchildvictims.blogspot.com/2014/11/excerpts-where-were-district-attorneys.html

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-6

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/let-this-be-a-warning/part3incestagenda

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/emailwoodco2011

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-4

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-3

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/seejun172013-wisconsinrapidswi

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/let-this-be-a-warning/incestagendapart2

Incest agenda part 2 - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Attention Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin parental alienation theory is a discredited pro-pedophile theory that gives custody of the child to the abuser.
Does Wisconsin Rapids Wisconsin support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory?
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-6

Untitled Post - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-2

co-parenting - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

As a LinkedIn member, you'll join 150 million other professionals who are sharing connections, ideas, and opportunities. And it's free! You'll also be able to:

Calling all Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?
If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost

Untitled Post - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

2009-2013 - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

sites.google.com

Excerpts see link
Use of Inappropriate Syndrome Testimonyhttp://kspope.com/ethics/malpractice.php
As early as September of 1989 Dr. Gary Melton and Susan Limber in an article entitled "Psychologists' Involvement in Cases of Child Maltreatment" [American Psychologist Vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 1225-1233] commented on the inappropriate use by therapists of syndromes that are not found in the various versions of Diagnosis and Statistical Manual. There have been a proliferation of such syndromes over the last several years. At this point using syndromes which are not appropriately researched or acknowledged by the profession is below the standard of care. Among the syndromes which are controversial and which should not be represented as accepted in the therapist community are Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome, Parental Alienation Syndrome, [Wiederholt v. Fischer 169 WIS 2d 524, 45 N.W. 2d 442 (1992)], False Memory Syndrome, and Malicious Mother Syndrome.http://kspope.com/ethics/malpractice.php

The Danger of Pedophilia Preying on America's Innocenthttp://www.truthmagazine.com/archives/volume44/V44020307.htm
Excerpts " Psychiatry and Psychology Experts. Pedophiles looking to find some “expert” to condone their behavior as “normal” will often turn to the institutions of psychiatry and psychology. For example, many pedophiles refer to a 1998 article by the American Psychological Association (APA) claiming that sex between adults and children can actually be positive for “willing” children. The same article proposes that we drop the terms “child abuse,” “molestation,” “victims” and “adult-child sex” when discussing this issue. This article was later modified by the APA, but many pedophiles continue to appeal to it to promote their actions. One psychologist, Dr. Michael Werthmeimer (member of the APA), believes that pedophilia is not harmful to the child. Dr. Richard Gardner, a child psychiatrist at Columbia University, believes that all forms of deviant sexual behavior should be acceptable, including adult-child sex, sex with the dead, sex with animals, and even sex with defecation. Of course, pedophiles make it a point to interview and quote from “experts” like Werthmeimer and Gardner.11"http://www.truthmagazine.com/archives/volume44/V44020307.htm

Reisman, J. (April 20, 1999). Child Custody for Sex Offenders. Worldnet Daily.http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16109
EXCERPT: Inevitably, Gardner 's sole experimental authority for this PAS theory is Alfred C. Kinsey. In fact, Gardner largely plagiarizes Chapters 5 in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Female (1953) to show child molestation is normal.

Child custody for sex offenders

www.wnd.com

A Free Press For A Free People Since 1997

http://www.thelizlibrary.org/supervised-visitation/supervised-visitation-stupidity.html

Endless Stupidity -- Advocacy for Supervised Visitation Centers

www.thelizlibrary.org

supervised visitation centers, parenting coordination, bad custody evaluation, custody evaluations, Laura Hohnecker, Martha Jacobson, Juliette Lippman, child custody, parenting...

If the evaluator issues a report based on PAS or even alienation, there is strong research in the Saunders’ study to challenge it. We can start by asking the evaluator if he agrees that sex between adults and children is improper. Then ask if there is any research not based on the belief that sex between adults and children can be appropriate (this is what PAS is based on), that “alienating” behavior creates a safety risk. Are you aware the DOJ study found that PAS, including by any other name has no scientific basis? Are you aware PAS was rejected for inclusion in the DSM-V because it has no scientific basis? Are you aware that the Saunders’ study found that evaluators with inadequate training tended to believe the myth that women frequently make false allegations but alienation theories, particularly those used to separate children from their primary attachment figure are based on a belief that most dv and child abuse allegations by mothers are false? Are you aware that evaluators are starting to lose their licenses for using PAS? Do you know if that is because they are in affect creating a diagnosis that does not exist? You can also ask questions comparing the harm of separating a child from their primary attachment figure with the harm of negative statements about the other parent. Ask for any research findings because there is no scientific support for these standard biased practices.http://timesupblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/department-of-justice-report-demands.html

Excerpts page 395
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/docs/Brown_PAS_impact.pdf
Call to Advocacy
If you are not familiar with families who are involved in PAS cases, you may not believe that these types of egregious acts occur. While listening to the stories of women and children,
I have felt overwhelmed and dumbfounded because the deck seems to be stacked against truth and justice. Ironically, the horrific abuses that occur in the marital relationship are comparable to the systematic oppression that is sanctioned by the state through the family courts after divorce. The legal system and its officers create kangaroo courts in which civil liberties and human rights are arbitrarily violated (Waller, Waller, & Shin, 2001).
There is no oversight and accountability for judges, lawyers, and mental health professionals who collude with the batterers and abusers. The need for a nationwide policy that bans PAS from family courts is long overdue. In
2006, the National Organization of Women moved toward this goal by denouncing PAS and resolving that any professional whose mission involves the protection of the rights of women and children denounce its use as unethical, unconstitutional, and dangerous. Social workers and other social justice advocates who are compelled to take action should, therefore,
educate themselves about the perils of PAS and validate the experiences of, and create safe spaces, for victims of this oppression to speak their truth. Furthermore, there must be a concerted effort to challenge the agents of the family courts and mental health professionals to stop perpetuating the abuse and violence against women and children. This is a call for advocacy and social change. Silence by social workers and other change agents maintains the status quo and emboldens the proponents of PAS. The abuse demonstrated in
the Baldwin–Basinger case only scratches the surface of what happens in the lives of families of all ethnic and socioeconomic levels across the United States. Outcry, critique, and debate must be linked to accountability, empowerment, and action to achieve social justice.
To be clear, PAS is not a legitimate diagnosis and should not be admitted into the courts. Overwhelmingly, it is used against mothers to raise suspicions of their psychosis and unfitness as parents. Users of this strategy do not seek custody for the safety and welfare of children. Instead, their sole mission is to create a legal shield of protection and silence and an unobstructed pathway to continue their abuses of power. When PAS is used as a legal strategy
in divorce cases, families are negatively affected; the women are demonized, and the children are at a grave risk of further abuse. http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/docs/Brown_PAS_impact.pdf

www.leadershipcouncil.org

Conclusion

At best, PAS is a nondiagnostic “syndrome” that only explains the behavior of the child and the mother when there is a known false allegation.20 It is a courtroom diagnosis befitting adversaries involved in legal sparring. It is not capable of lending itself to hard data or inclusion in the forthcoming DSM-V.

In short, PAS is an untested theory that, unchallenged, can have far-reaching consequences for children seeking protection and legal vindication in courts of law.

Prosecutors and other child abuse professionals should educate themselves, their colleagues and clients when confronting PAS in the legal realm. Part 2 of this newsletter will address the case law on this subject. For more in-depth and comprehensive treatment of these issues, contact the National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse.http://www.ndaa.org/ncpca_update_v16_no6.html

Update Newsletter Volume 16, Number 6

www.ndaa.org

The late Dr. Richard Gardner, a clinical professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University, coined Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) in 1985, after noticing a “disorder” among patients within his private practice. The “disorder” involves one parent...

Excerpts "Many women have testified under oath regarding the forced removal of their children based on the scientifically inept theory of Parental Alienation Syndrome promulgated by Kinseyan-adherent Richard Gardner and his disciples. This suggests that few judges have read the following excerpt from the report of the Attorney General's Task Force on Family Violence."http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2005/08/implications_of.html

Judith Gelernter Reisman, Ph.D. - Laws: Implications of the Kinsey Reports on Child Custody Cases

www.drjudithreisman.com

The quality and health of a society is measured by the treatment of its most vulnerable populations: its women and children. 1 Many facts support the conclusion that we are living in an increasingly violent era. For example, current data on violent crimes, suicides, out of...

Conclusions

In spite of its many shortcomings, many courts have accepted PAS because it apparently appears to explain a well-recognized phenomenon within custody battles - the often acrimonious fight between parents for their child's affection. However, Daubert demands that scientists conduct competent science before becoming paid experts. Gardner 's PAS theory and his various scales to differentiate true and false claims of child sexual abuse are not informed by science and have been discredited by his peers. Rather than subjecting his theories to scientific review, most of Gardner 's writings are published through his own press or in nonscientific journals. Because Gardner 's theories are based on his clinical observations and not on scientific data, they must be understood in the context of his atypical views concerning pedophilia and child sexual abuse.

Gardner 's theories are based on his assumption that sex between a child and an adult is not inherently harmful, and his belief that there is an epidemic of false sexual abuse allegations being made by vengeful wives during custody disputes. Gardner maintains these beliefs in spite of a wealth of clinical and experimental data which prove otherwise. This is not to imply that such allegations are always accurate, or that parents do not attempt to manipulate their children during adversarial custody litigation. However, Gardner 's theories are not sufficiently scientific to be able to make cause and effect determinations, are biased against women and children, and are flawed by their failure to take into account alternative explanations for the behavior of the parties involved.

Frustration over bitter custody battles should not tempt the legal system to blindly accept unproven theories such as PAS. Reliance on such simplified approaches to the complex problem of alleged abuse in the context of child custody disputes is likely to result in misdiagnosis and a failure to protect children. High conflict divorces take an emotional toll on children, and this toll should not be exacerbated through the use of "junk science" which may wrongly deny children a relationship with the parent who has heretofore been their primary caretaker. In the end, all psychological evidence upon which a child's safety will turn should represent the best that science has to offer, not one man's unsupported opinions and assumptions.http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/3.html

Dallam - PAS Is It Scientific?

www.leadershipcouncil.org

Dallam, S. J. (1999). Parental Alienation Syndrome: Is it scientific? In E. St. Charles & L. Crook (Eds.), Expose: The failure of family courts to protect children from abuse in custody disputes . Los Gatos , CA : Our Children Our Children Charitable Foundation.

Wisconsin Rapids WI citizens does Wisconsin rapids WI support the use of a discredited pro-pedophile theory in family court?

If not please call the Wisconsin Rapids District attorneys office and demand they block parental alienation theory experts from the court system and stop the gateway legalization of child abuse and placement of children in the abusers homes thank you (715) 421-8515
https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/national-chart/wisconsin-rapids-wi/untitledpost-1

Untitled Post - PARENTALALIENATIONINVENTOR

Timeforjusticeandprotectionforthechildren

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Warning Wisconsin rapids discredited pas theory: links for Wisconsin rapids

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

Blog Archive