Investigate/remove Wis. PhD gateway legalizing child abuse protect children
Please help us protect children of Wisconsin with an Investigation/Removal of this Wisconsin DHS contracted PhD. This PhD is gateway legalizing child abuse with custody evaluations based on the discredited parental alienation.
No child is safe in Wisconsin with this PhD involved in Child custody studies. Children have been placed in harms way because of the reports this expert is writing in criminal child abuse cases/custody studies and protected by the department of Health and Human services.
Please see all supporting evidence below and help us protect future children from being placed in abusers homes.
We can save lives by removing this Department of Health and human services PhD and investigating to ensure this never happens again. please sign here and hep us protect children https://www.change.org/p/wisconsin-department-of-safety-and-professional-services-investigate-remove-wis-phd-gateway-legalizing-child-abuse-protect-children-32ce17a6-1cf9-4cc0-9929-2f8eb85ca176
01 Nelson 02 Michael Jan 03 Ph.D. 04 Psychologist ... - The Liz Library
www.thelizlibrary.org/therapeutic-jurisprudence/nelson.txt
01 Nelson 02 Michael Jan 03 Ph.D. 04 Psychologist 05 420 1st Avenue South 06 P. O. Box 1535 07 Wisconsin Rapids 08 WI 09 54495 10 715-424-3400 11 ... case transmogrified with therapization into a semi-parental alienation case, with .Excerpts "QUOTES FROM CUSTODY EVALUATION:"Even when there has been a finding of fact a child has been sexually
abused, it cannot be presumed that the child has been traumatized. It is
not reasonable to presume that any form of sexual contact between a
parent and child would, ipso facto, be experienced by the child as trauma.
Certain forms of contact, the most obvious being some form of penetration
would be painful and typically would be experienced as traumatic, but
licking and other forms of contact might be perceived by young child as
pleasurable or as silly rather than horrible.
01 Nelson 02 Michael Jan 03 Ph.D. 04 Psychologist 05 420 1st Avenue South 06 P. O. Box 1535 07 Wisconsin Rapids 08 WI 09 54495 10 715-424-3400 11 ... case transmogrified with therapization into a semi-parental alienation case, with .Excerpts "QUOTES FROM CUSTODY EVALUATION:"Even when there has been a finding of fact a child has been sexually
abused, it cannot be presumed that the child has been traumatized. It is
not reasonable to presume that any form of sexual contact between a
parent and child would, ipso facto, be experienced by the child as trauma.
Certain forms of contact, the most obvious being some form of penetration
would be painful and typically would be experienced as traumatic, but
licking and other forms of contact might be perceived by young child as
pleasurable or as silly rather than horrible.
Dr. Nelson recognizes parental alienation letter https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbMUNXYXNGcjBGZGc/view?usp=sharing
Wisconsin rapids parental alienation ads including Nelson at Clinical services https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbR256ZHExRzkxdlU/view?usp=sharing
Wisconsin rapids parental alienation ads including Nelson at Clinical services https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbR256ZHExRzkxdlU/view?usp=sharing
Nelsons expert is Micheal lamb
Nelson expert is mike lamb part 2
Nelson expert is mike lamb part 3
Wisconsin afcc member Michael Nelson
Micheal Nelson afcc member and social service vendor
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbZzNvNEVhRi1qZlJ6V1FQQVpZc2dLMUYzOUs4/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbZzNvNEVhRi1qZlJ6V1FQQVpZc2dLMUYzOUs4/view?usp=sharing
Excerpts "Attention: wood county Health & Human Services Committee and Judicial & Legislative Committee enclosed you will find Wisconsin Rapids social service vendor Micheal nelson and evidence showing this vendor is using a dangerous discredited theory called parental alienation. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KeF9pQyo_SSfDjWq7LhxGFgLGY0AxUZoOgfIOTUz5Vx3cTM0mdpiOj-uAVjKU_HIbgfcnJkTgpL9S31Q/view?usp=sharing
Wisconsin holds international headquarters for the Afcc?
Making Divorce Pay: The Association of Family and Conciliation Courts takes back -scratching to a new level
By Michael Volpe, Organization Trends, July 2015 (PDF here)
Summary: You’ve probably never heard of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, but its 5,000-plus members are lawyers, judges, and family court professionals who have enormous power in family legal disputes. The group claims to be guided by “the best interest of the child,” but it is beyond dispute that it serves well the financial interests of its members, who are able to require the use of each other’s services and force parents to pay. Members also make use of dubious psychological theories that can do injustice to parents as well as children.
National District Attorneys Association NATIONAL CENTER FOR PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE Volume 16, Number 6, 2003 Parental Alienation Syndrome: What Professionals Need to Know Part 1 of 2 By Erika Rivera Ragland 1 & Hope Fields2 Hard Copy https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbZ0RUU1A4ZW5oTms/view?usp=sharing
Parental Alienation Syndrome: What Professionals Need to Know Part 2 of 2
By Hope Fields1 & Erika Rivera Ragland2 NATIONAL CENTER FOR PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE National District Attorneys Association
PAS is an unproven theory that can threaten the integrity of the criminal justice system and the safety of abused children. Prosecutors should educate themselves about PAS and be prepared to argue against its admission in court. In cases where PAS testimony is admitted, it is a prosecutor’s responsibility to educate the judge and jury about the shortfalls of this theory. As more criminal courts refuse to admit PAS evidence, more protection will be afforded to victims of sexual abuse in our court system. National District Attorneys Association NATIONAL CENTER FOR PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE Volume 16, Number 7, 2003 Parental Alienation Syndrome: What Professionals Need to Know Part 2 of 2 By Hope Fields1 & Erika Rivera Ragland2 Hard Copy https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbQnkwd0pQTHBlbnc/view?usp=sharing
By Hope Fields1 & Erika Rivera Ragland2 NATIONAL CENTER FOR PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE National District Attorneys Association
PAS is an unproven theory that can threaten the integrity of the criminal justice system and the safety of abused children. Prosecutors should educate themselves about PAS and be prepared to argue against its admission in court. In cases where PAS testimony is admitted, it is a prosecutor’s responsibility to educate the judge and jury about the shortfalls of this theory. As more criminal courts refuse to admit PAS evidence, more protection will be afforded to victims of sexual abuse in our court system. National District Attorneys Association NATIONAL CENTER FOR PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE Volume 16, Number 7, 2003 Parental Alienation Syndrome: What Professionals Need to Know Part 2 of 2 By Hope Fields1 & Erika Rivera Ragland2 Hard Copy https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54GIMT71CgbQnkwd0pQTHBlbnc/view?usp=sharing
Source checking " concocted Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) -- a legal defense of child molesters -- as the means to conceal a pedophile "ring" operating through family courts" https://sites.google.com/site/parentalalienationinventor/home/source-checking-concocted-parental-alienation-syndrome-pas----a-legal-defense-of-child-molesters----as-the-means-to-conceal-a-pedophile-ring-operating-through-family-courts Excerpts "Another key link between the NIH female sexual arousal study and the 'closet' pedophile agenda, is Michael Lamb of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Lamb, who heads the Section on Social and Emotional Development, is closely affiliated with the pro-pedophilia "experts" whose materials are used by fathers' group members in their own court cases. Lamb writing's may give the appearance of neutrality, but they are carefully crafted to provide justification for disqualifying evidence of pedophilia."
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges A Judicial Guide to Child Safety in Custody Cases
Excerpts "C. [§3.3] A Word of Caution about Parental Alienation34
Under relevant evidentiary standards, the court should not accept testimony regarding parental alienation syndrome, or “PAS.” The theory positing the existence of PAS has been discredited by the scientific community. 35 In Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), the Supreme Court ruled that even expert testimony based in the “soft sciences” must meet the standard set in the Daubert case. 36 Daubert, in which the court re-examined the standard it had earlier articulated in the Frye 37 case, requires application of a multi-factor test, including peer review, publication, testability, rate of error, and general acceptance.
PAS does not pass this test. Any testimony that a party to a custody case suffers from the syndrome or “parental alienation” should therefore be ruled inadmissible and stricken from
the evaluation report under both the standard established in Daubert and the earlier Frye standard. 38 http://www.ncjfcj.org/sites/default/files/judicial%20guide_0_0.pdf
Excerpts "C. [§3.3] A Word of Caution about Parental Alienation34
Under relevant evidentiary standards, the court should not accept testimony regarding parental alienation syndrome, or “PAS.” The theory positing the existence of PAS has been discredited by the scientific community. 35 In Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), the Supreme Court ruled that even expert testimony based in the “soft sciences” must meet the standard set in the Daubert case. 36 Daubert, in which the court re-examined the standard it had earlier articulated in the Frye 37 case, requires application of a multi-factor test, including peer review, publication, testability, rate of error, and general acceptance.
PAS does not pass this test. Any testimony that a party to a custody case suffers from the syndrome or “parental alienation” should therefore be ruled inadmissible and stricken from
the evaluation report under both the standard established in Daubert and the earlier Frye standard. 38 http://www.ncjfcj.org/sites/default/files/judicial%20guide_0_0.pdf
See Discredited Parental alienation Reference list https://sites.google.com/view/whatisgoingoninfamilycourt/discredited-parental-alienation-reference-list
