| |||||||
| subject: | Wisconsin Chief Justice Guilty of Judicial code of conduct violations? | ||||||
| mailed-by: | gmail.com |
https://docs.google.com/
“REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION”
__on behalf of The Countless families and child victims revictimized by the courts acceptance of the discredited parental alienation theory in Wisconsin Courts which has led to child victims being placed in reported abusers homes
https://docs.google.com/
60.03 A judge shall avoid impropriety and the
appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities.
(1) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act
at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity
and impartiality of the judiciary.
COMMENT
__________In striking this balance the following factors should be considered:
(a) the degree to which the personal conduct is public or private;
(b) the degree to which the personal conduct is a protected individual right;
(c) the potential for the personal conduct to directly harm or offend others;
(d) the degree to which the personal conduct is indicative of bias or prejudice on the part of
the judge;
(e) the degree to which the personal conduct is indicative of the judge's lack of respect for
the public or the judicial/legal system.
See also Comment to sub. (3).
(2) A judge may not allow family, social, political or other
relationships to influence the judge's judicial conduct or judgment. A
judge may not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private
interests of the judge or of others or convey or permit others to convey
the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.
A judge may not testify voluntarily as a character witness.
__SCR 60.03 A judge shall avoid impropriety and the
appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities.
(1) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act
at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity
Excerpts " Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, a progressive, held the second most wealth for the 2013 calendar year. She held at least $600,000 in assets while holding no debt. "
__________Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson____________________
(name of judge or court commissioner)
__________Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson____________chief justice _________________wood county ___, ___________________________, Wisconsin.
(city) (county)
Wis. 1995-2001 supporting evidence for Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson_
1978-2014 supporting evidence for Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson_and attorney ernesto romero.
https://docs.google.com/
“REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION”
“REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION”
__on behalf of The Countless families and child victims revictimized by the courts acceptance of the discredited parental alienation theory in Wisconsin Courts which has led to child victims being placed in reported abusers homes
Wisconsin Citizens Please Email This to your representatives and Legislators: Requesting Judicial Investigation and Immediate implementation of the Safe Child act in Wisconsin to stop the placement of children into the abusers home
Thank you to all who pass this along and as always standbythechildren
Thank you
Email list
Wisconsin it is long over do for the safe child act.
See history and counties affected and please send the safe child act to all Wisconsin reps many are aware of this legislation already and children are at stake here. It is high time Wisconsin ends the discredited pas theory and protects child victims reporting abuse not sentence them to live with abusers which is what pas theory does best.Protect the children Wisconsin and put an end to the pas theory for profit. see Wisconsin https://plus.google.
Friday, March 16, 2012
Wisconsin Citizens Please Email This to All representatives and Legislators in WIsconsin: Requesting Judicial Investigation and Immediate implementation of the Safe Child act in Wisconsin to stop the placement of children into the abusers homeSafe Child Act by Barry Goldstein
Excerpts "Furthermore professionals who seek to use such bogus
theories would be barred from participating in domestic violence cases. The recent rejection of the campaign to include PAS in the DSM IV because it has no scientific basis should make it easy for PAS to be rejected including when it is used by other names such as parental alienation or just alienation, Friday, March 16, 2012Safe Child Actby Barry Goldsteinhttp://timesupblog.blogspot. Last month my article was about legislation needed to stop custody courts from routinely sending children into the custody of dangerous abusers. My meeting with a state legislator led to her request that I prepare a proposal that would be the basis of legislation to reform the broken system. I would like to thank Toby Kleinman for her assistance in drafting this proposal. Immediately below will be my proposal for a Safe Child Act and I will then discuss why I think this would make a difference. You are most welcome to post or otherwise use this proposal and this article in support of efforts to reform the system. In fact I hope many people will take the proposal for a Safe Child Act and ask their legislators to sponsor it. " http://timesupblog.blogspot. Safe Child Act by Barry Goldstein Purpose: Improve the Safety of Children involved in Child Custody Cases With these provisions the courts can stop sending children to live with dangerous abusers. Instead of pressuring mothers to cooperate with their abusers they can be using their power and authority to require him to stop his abuse if he wants to have a relationship with the children. It is important for legislators and court professionals to understand that children do not need both parents equally. They need the safe parent more than the abusive one and their primary attachment figure more than their other parent. It is certainly high time the courts start making decisions that are truly based on what is really in the best interests of the children. by Barry Goldstein http://timesupblog.blogspot. Excerpt http://timesupblog. name, but the law would bar theories like PAS that have no scientific basis. Furthermore professionals who seek to use such bogus theories would be barred from participating in domestic violence cases. The recent rejection of the campaign to include PAS in the DSM IV because it has no scientific basis should make it easy for PAS to be rejected including when it is used by other names such as parental alienation or just alienation,
Parental alienation theory history do you support this?
These Sources will leave you wondering why anyone would have supported parental alienation theory had they read Richard Gardner's own words...
https://docs.google.com/
Wisconsin rapids to Wausau Wisconsin it is time to stop the pas theory for profit and protect children from this discredited pro-sex with children theory. No child should be court order to stay in sex offenders and abusers homes because of this discredited toxic harmful theory Wisconsin rapids to Wausau Wisconsin its time to protect children reporting abuse.
Stop the pas theory all the legal is there to protect children from placements in the abusers homes. Stop normalizing and gateway legalizing child sexual abuse for $$$ off the backs of our most vulnerable population. Our most vulnerable population is being placed in grave danger and their rights are violated when parental alienation theory is allowed and accepted. Pas theory gateway legalizes all child abuse and places children directly in the abusers home, while gateway legalizing child sexual abuse, and promoting normalization of sex with children. We must stop this theory from entering our churches, learning institutions, Government agencies, court systems, Cities, county's,States,Nation and Globe. The consequences to children reporting abuse could not be more grave when pas theory is allowed. Our children are this countries future it is about time we start protecting them not exploiting them Thank you to all who lend a voice, time, and effort to share the legal. Together we can eradicate this discredited theory and protect children from placement in the abusers home
WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COMMISSION “REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION” pdf
Instructions for Completing
“REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION”
__on behalf of The Countless families and child victims revictimized by the courts acceptance of the discredited parental alienation theory in Wisconsin Courts which has led to child victims being placed in reported abusers homes
Excerpts "What Does it Mean if Court Professionals Seek to Use PAS?
Court professionals should know that PAS is bogus and unscientific. This means that when they promote claims based on PAS they are either deliberately trying to help abusers or do not possess the training necessary to understand the harm of PAS or anything else having to do with domestic violence. It really does not matter what the reason is for their mistakes, they should not be involved in domestic violence cases. In the case of evaluators or other mental health professionals, they should be familiar with the DSM-V. This would make them aware of the rejection of PAS because there is no scientific research to support it. Accordingly, they would be guilty of malpractice if they diagnose a condition that does not exist in the DSM. Already some psychologists have lost their licenses for this improper practice and with the latest rejection of PAS, this consequence should occur more frequently. Indeed it is only the tendency of professionals to protect fellow professionals that have discouraged investigations of these obvious violations. The Saunders’ study found that professionals with inadequate training tended to rely on unscientific alienation theories. This in turn led to outcomes that harm children. This finding alone would demand that courts refuse to rely on mental health professionals with these biased and baseless beliefs. Although lawyers are not mental health professionals, a belief in PAS confirms inadequate training and thus should disqualify them from working on domestic violence cases. Certainly courts should immediately dismiss any “neutral” professional who seeks to make decisions based on a PAS analysis. This is true even if they seek to obscure their mistake by calling it something else. "
Wisconsin Citizens Please Email This to your representatives and Legislators: Requesting Judicial Investigation and Immediate implementation of the Safe Child act in Wisconsin to stop the placement of children into the abusers home
Thank you to all who pass this along and as always standbythechildren Thank you Thank you to all who pass this along and as always standbythechildren Thank you | |||||||||||||
and impartiality of the judiciary.
No comments:
Post a Comment