Thursday, March 1, 2012

APPENDIX B: PRECEDENTBEARING CASES BY JURISDICTION



Jennifer Hoult
Vol. 26 ♦ No. 1 ♦ Spring 2006
Children’s Legal Rights Journal
Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome
http://209.198.129.131/images/EvidentiaryAmissibilityofPAW_Hoult_CLRJ_2006.pdf 

Excerpts see page 23-25

APPENDIX B: PRECEDENTBEARING CASES BY
JURISDICTION
Federal
1.  Edwards v. Williams, 170 F.Supp.2d 727; 2001
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18360 (E.D.Ky. 2001).
States
Alabama
2.  K.B. v. Cleburne County Department of Human
Resources, 897 So. 2d 379; 2004 Ala. Civ. App.
LEXIS 740, **9  (Ala. Civ. App. October 1,
2004).
3.  C.J.L. v. M.W.B., 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 100
(Ala.Civ.App. Feb. 28, 2003) (to be reported);
2003 WL 21488740 (Ala. Civ. App., June 27,
2003). 24  Jennifer Hoult
Children’s Legal Rights Journal
4.  M.W.W. v. B.W., 900 So. 2d 1230; 2004 Ala. Civ.
App. LEXIS 700 (Ala. Civ. App. September 10,
2004).
Alaska
5.  Pearson v. Pearson, 5 P.3d 239; 2000 Alas.
LEXIS 69 (Alaska 2000).
6.  Plate v. Alaska, 925 P.2d 1057; 1996 Alas. App.
LEXIS 47 (Alaska Ct.App. 1996).
Arkansas
7.  Chambers v. Chambers, 2000 Ark App. LEXIS
476 (Ark.Ct.App. June 21, 2000).
California
8.  In re Marriage of Condon, 62 Cal. App. 4th 533;
73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 33; 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 231;
98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2108; 98 Daily Journal
DAR 2924 (Cal.Ct.App. 1998).
9.  Coursey v. Superior Court (Coursey), 194 Cal.
App. 3d 147; 239 Cal. Rptr. 365; 1987 Cal. App.
LEXIS 2029 (Cal.Ct.App. 1987).
10. In re the Marriage Edlund, 66 Cal. App. 4th
1454; 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 671; 1998 Cal. App.
LEXIS 827; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7552; 98
Daily Journal DAR 10449 (Cal.Ct.App. 1998).
11. In re John W. v. Phillip W., 41 Cal. App. 4th 961;
48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 899; 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 17;
96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 205; 96 Daily Journal
DAR 283 (Cal.Ct.App. 1996).
Connecticut
12. Ruggiero v. Ruggiero, 76 Conn. App. 338; 819
A.2d 864; 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 181
(Conn.App.Ct. 2003).
Delaware
13. Ford v. Ford, 2000 Del. Fam. Ct. LEXIS 104
(Del. Fam. Ct. Dec. 19, 2000).
Florida
14. Blosser v. Blosser, 707 So. 2d 778; 1998 Fla.
App. LEXIS 79; 23 Fla. L. Weekly D 257
(Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1998).
15. In Interest of T.W.M.., 553 So. 2d 260; 1989 Fla.
App. LEXIS 6591; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2733
(Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1989).
16. Perlow v. Berg-Perlow, 816 So. 2d 210; 2002 Fla.
App. LEXIS 6179; 27 Fla. L. Weekly D 1108
(Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 2002).
17.  Schutz v. Schutz, 522 S.2d 874; 1988 Fla. App.
LEXIS 411; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 387; 13 Fla. L.
Weekly D 387 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1988).
Illinois
18. In  re  Violetta  B., 210 Ill. App. 3d 521; 568
N.E.2d 1345; 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 312; 154 Ill.
Dec. 896 (Ill. App. Ct. 1991).
19. In Re Marriage of Bates, 212 Ill. 2d 489; 819
N.E.2d 714; 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1619; 289 Ill. Dec.
218 (Ill. October 28, 2004); 342 Ill. App. 3d 207;
794 N.E.2d 868; 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 879; 276
Ill. Dec. 618 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003) (partly
unpublished).
20. In re Marriage of Divelbiss, 308 Ill. App. 3d 198;
719 N.E.2d 375; 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 750; 241
Ill. Dec. 514 (Ill.App.Ct. Oct. 22, 1999) (partly
unpublished).
Indiana
21. In re Paternity of V.A.M.C., 768 N.E.2d 990;
2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 808 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002)
(also cited as Moden v. Corr).
22. Hanson v. Spolnik, 685 N.E.2d 71; 1997 Ind.
App. LEXIS 1205 (dissent) (Ind. App. 1997).
23. Kirk v. Kirk, 759 N.E.2d 265; 2001 Ind. App.
LEXIS 2067 (Ind. App. 2001).
24. White v. White, 655 N.E.2d 523; 1995 Ind. App.
LEXIS 1087 (Ind. App. 1995).
Iowa
25. In re Marriage of Rosenfeld, 524 N.W.2d 212;
1994 Iowa App. LEXIS 104 (Iowa Ct. App.
1994).
Louisiana
26. Hollingswoth v. Semerad, 799 So. 2d 658; 2001
La. App. LEXIS 2444 (La. Ct. App. 2001).
27. White v. Kimrey, 847 So. 2d 157; 2003 La. App.
LEXIS 1411 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
Maryland
28. Barton v. Hirschberg, 137 Md. App. 1; 767 A.2d
874, 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 27; (Md. Ct. Spec.
App. March 1, 2001).
Mississippi
29. Ellis v. Ellis, 840 So. 2d 806; 2003 Miss. App.
LEXIS 195 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
Missouri
30. Kuehne v. State, 107 S.W.3d 285; 2003 Mo. App.
LEXIS 258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
New York
31. Karen B. v. Clyde M., 151 Misc. 2d 794; 574
N.Y.S.2d 267; 1991 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 463 (N.Y.
Fam. Ct. 1991)  affd. sub nom Karen “PP” v.
Clyde “QC”, 197 A.D.2d 753; 602 N.Y.S.2d 709;
1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9845 (N.Y.App.Div.
1993).
32. People v. Bimonte, 185 Misc. 2d 390; 712
N.Y.S.2d 829; 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 339 (N.Y.
2000). Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome  25
Vol. 26 ♦ No. 1 ♦ Spring 2006
33.  Smith v. Bombard, 294 A.D.2d 673; 741
N.Y.S.2d 336; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4726
(N.Y. App. Div. 2002).
34. Dorothy A. DeMeyer v. Advantage Auto, 2005
NY Slip Op 25252; 2005 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1288
at *6, (N.Y. Sup. Ct. June 27, 2005).
35. In the matter of J.F. v. L.F., 181 Misc. 2d 722;
694 N.Y.S.2d 592; 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 357
(N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1999).
36. People v. Fortin, 289 A.D.2d 590; 735 N.Y.S.2d
819; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13035 (N.Y.
App. Div. Dec. 31, 2001); 184 Misc. 2d 10; 706
N.Y.S.2d 611; 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 88 (N.Y.
Co. Ct. 2000).
37. Krebsbach v. Gallagher, 181 A.D.2d 363; 587
N.Y.S.2d 346; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9832
(N.Y. App. Div. 1992).
38. People v. Loomis, 172 Misc. 2d 265; 658
N.Y.S.2d 787; 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 141 (N.Y.
Co. Ct. 1997).
39. Zafran v. Zafran, 191 Misc. 2d 60; 740 N.Y.S.2d
596; 2002 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 221 (N.Y. 2002).
Nevada
40. April Raburn Martin vs. James Lee Martin, 90
P.3d 981; 2004 Nev. LEXIS 43; 120 Nev. Adv.
Rep. 38, n5 **6 (Nev. 2004).
41. Truax v. Truax, 110 Nev. 437; 874 P.2d 10; 1994
Nev. LEXIS 60 (Nev. 1994).
North Dakota
42. Loll v. Loll, 1997 ND 51; 561 N.W.2d 625; 1997
N.D. LEXIS 52 (N.D. 1997).
43. In the Interest of T.T., 2004 ND 138; 681 N.W.2d
779, 784; 2004 N.D. LEXIS 237 (N.D. June 30,
2004).
Ohio
44. Arthur v. Arthur, 130 Ohio App. 3d 398; 720
N.E.2d 176; 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 5109 (Ohio
Ct. App. 1998).
45. Bates v. Bates, 2001 Ohio 8743; 2001 Ohio App.
LEXIS 5428 (Ohio Ct. App. Dec. 7, 2001).
46. Conner v. Renz, 1995 Ohio App. LEXIS 176
(Ohio Ct.App. Jan. 19, 1995); 1994 Ohio App.
LEXIS 6079 (Ohio Ct. App. Dec. 29, 1994).
47. Doerman v. Doerman, 2002 Ohio 3165; 2002
Ohio App. LEXIS 3183 (Ohio June 24, 2002).
48. In the Matter of S.G., 2003 Ohio 161; 2003 Ohio
App. LEXIS 109; 2003 WL 125122 (Ohio Ct.
App. Jan. 16, 2003).
49.  State v. Koelling, 1995 Ohio App. LEXIS 1056
(Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 21, 1995).
50. Pathan v. Pathan, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 119
(Ohio Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2000).
51. Pisani v. Pisani, 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 4421
(Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
52.  Sims v. Hornsby, 1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 4074
(Ohio Ct. App. Aug. 10, 1992).
53.  Sinsky v. Matthews, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3479
(Ohio Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2001); 2001 Ohio 1939;
2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 5496; 2001 WL 1581569
(Ohio Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2001).
54. Toto v. Toto, 1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 157 (Ohio
Ct. App. Jan. 16, 1992)(also cited as Zigmont v.
Toto).
55. In re Adoption of Wagner, 1999 Ohio App.
LEXIS 3097 (Ohio Ct. App. June 30, 1999); 1999
Ohio App. LEXIS 3117 (Ohio Ct. App. June 30,
1999).
Oklahoma
56. Kaiser v. Kaiser, 2001 OK 30; 23 P.3d 278; 2001
Okla. LEXIS 30; 72 O.B.A.J.1050 (Okla. 2001).
Texas
57. Ochs v. Martinez, 789 S.W.2d 949; 1990 Tex.
App. LEXIS 1652 (Tex. App. 1990).
Vermont
58. Cabot v. Cabot, 166 Vt. 485; 697 A.2d 644; 1997
Vt. LEXIS 101 (dissent) (Vt. 1997).
West Virginia
59.  State ex rel. George B.W. v. Kaufman, 199 W.
Va. 269; 483 S.E.2d 852; 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 25
(W.Va.1997).
Wisconsin
60. Finster v. Finster, 2003 WI App 201; 267 Wis. 2d
278; 670 N.W.2d 557; 2003 Wisc. App. LEXIS
788 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003).
61. In re Disciplinary Proceedings against David L.
Nichols, 2002 WI 60; 253 Wis. 2d 149; 645
N.W.2d 270; 2002 Wisc. LEXIS 449 (Wis. June
14, 2002).
62. Wiederholt v. Fischer, 169 Wis. 2d 524; 485
N.W.2d 442; 1992 Wisc. App. LEXIS 473 (Wis.
Ct. App. 1992).
Wyoming
63. Carlton v. Carlton, 997 P.2d 1028; 2000 Wyo.
LEXIS 44 (Wyo. March 1, 2000).
64. McCoy v. State, 886 P.2d 252; 1994 Wyo. LEXIS
154 (Wyo. 1994).


Jennifer Hoult
Vol. 26 ♦ No. 1 ♦ Spring 2006
Children’s Legal Rights Journal
Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome
http://209.198.129.131/images/EvidentiaryAmissibilityofPAW_Hoult_CLRJ_2006.pdf 

No comments:

Post a Comment